James Henderson v. Ralph Diaz
| RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
| JAMES LIMONT HENDERSON |
| 19-55730 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/17/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11343666] (JPD) [Entered: 06/25/2019 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Henderson v. Ralph Diaz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Webster |
| Represented By: | Ana R. Duarte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JAMES LIMONT HENDERSON | |
| Represented By: | James Limont Henderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
