Jon White v. Daniel Strong, et al
| JON ASTOR WHITE, an individual |
| DANIEL WILLIAM STRONG, AKA Strong, LEE DANIELS, TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX, INC. and IMAGINE ENTERTAINMENT |
| 19-55735 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Peter Afrasiabi for party(s) Appellant Jon Astor White, in case 19-55735. [11371724] (KD) [Entered: 07/22/2019 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants unopposed motion for inclusion of this appeal in the Ninth Circuits Pro Bono Law Clinic Program (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect Kathryn M. Davis, Esq., Peter Afrasiabi, Esq., and the UC Irvine School of Law, as pro bono counsel of record for appellant. Briefing shall proceed as follows: the opening brief is due October 18, 2019; the answering brief is due December 17, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due February 14, 2020. This appeal shall be calendared for oral argument during the month of April 2020. Pro bono counsel shall appear at oral argument. Counsel are advised this appeal has been expedited and extensions of time for briefing will not be granted absent a showing of extraordinary and compelling circumstances. Appellate ECF requests for streamlined or automatic extensions of time will not be granted, and any such relief must be requested in a written motion pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). (Pro Bono) [11371713] (KD) [Entered: 07/22/2019 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellees Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., Imagine Entertainment, Lee Daniels and Daniel William Strong response to motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 07/15/2019. [11364186] [19-55735] (Petrocelli, Daniel) [Entered: 07/15/2019 06:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Jon Astor White Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Include Appeal in Ninth Circuit Pro Bono Program and Appoint Kathryn Davis, Peter Afrasiabi, and UC Irvine School of Law Appellate Litigation Clinic as Pro Bono Counsel]. Date of service: 07/12/2019. [11361744] [19-55735] (Davis, Kathryn) [Entered: 07/12/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Kathryn Marie Davis for party(s) Appellant Jon Astor White, in case 19-55735. [11361673] (JFF) [Entered: 07/12/2019 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kathryn Marie Davis (Corrected: Law Office of Kathryn M. Davis 530 South Lake Avenue No. 425 Pasadena CA 91101) for Appellant Mr. Jon Astor White. Substitution for Party Mr. Jon Astor White. Date of service: 07/12/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: Yes) [11361640] [19-55735] (Davis, Kathryn) [Entered: 07/12/2019 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kathryn M. Davis, UC Irvine School of Law Appellate Litigation Clinic (UC Irvine School of Law Appellate Litigation Clinic c/o One LLP, 4000 MacArthur Blvd. East Tower, Suite 500, Newport Beach, California, 92660) for Appellant Mr. Jon Astor White. Date of service: 07/12/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: Yes) [11361338] [19-55735] (Davis, Kathryn) [Entered: 07/12/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jon Astor White opening brief due 08/26/2019. Appellees Lee Daniels, Imagine Entertainment, Daniel William Strong and Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. answering brief due 09/26/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11345536] (RT) [Entered: 06/26/2019 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
