Adam Perzow v. Moshe Hogeg, et al
| JOSEPH CHEN, MOSHE HOGEG, KENGES RAKISHEV and DOES, 2-10, 12-20 |
| ADAM PERZOW |
| 19-55763 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 37
MANDATE ISSUED.(CMC, PJB and LVD) [11841825] (RL) [Entered: 09/30/2020 09:06 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11815264] (MM) [Entered: 09/08/2020 09:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 35
SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS TO CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and LAWRENCE VANDYKE. [11789329] (DLM) [Entered: 08/14/2020 10:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: WL): The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. This case is ordered submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument on August 14, 2020, in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [11763849] (WL) [Entered: 07/23/2020 01:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Michael A. Bowse, Esquire for Appellant Adam Perzow. Hearing in Pasadena on 08/14/2020 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: 3). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 10.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 07/21/2020. [11760979] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 07/21/2020 03:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, August 14, 2020 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Previously Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument will be held remotely with all of the judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Your travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with your directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Friday, August 14, 2020. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11705994]. [19-55763] (AW) [Entered: 05/31/2020 06:13 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 30 ] submitted by Adam Perzow is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [11696430] (SML) [Entered: 05/20/2020 09:28 AM]
|
|
Filing 30
Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Adam Perzow. Date of service: 05/19/2020. [11696176] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 05/19/2020 06:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
Filed (ECF) Attorney Rita M. Haeusler, Esquire for Appellee Moshe Hogeg response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 04/28/2020. [11674559] [19-55763] (Haeusler, Rita) [Entered: 04/28/2020 01:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for August 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11670606]. [19-55763] (AW) [Entered: 04/24/2020 09:31 AM]
|
|
Updated deadlines. Automatic 60 day extension Re: Notice Covid 19 (Docket Entry No. [ # 27 ]) Appellant Adam Perzow reply brief due 05/20/2020. [11635800] (EU) [Entered: 03/19/2020 04:19 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
Filed (ECF) Appellant Adam Perzow Correspondence: 60 Day Extension of Appellant's Reply Brief due to logistical issues related to Covid-19.. Date of service: 03/18/2020 [11633603] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 03/18/2020 10:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 26
Filed (ECF) Attorney Rita M. Haeusler, Esquire for Appellee Moshe Hogeg response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 03/12/2020. [11628547] [19-55763] (Haeusler, Rita) [Entered: 03/12/2020 05:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for July 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11626900]. [19-55763] (AW) [Entered: 03/11/2020 06:02 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
Streamlined request [23] by Appellant Adam Perzow to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamlined requests allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief. Amended briefing schedule: The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief 04/06/2020. [11614166] (JN) [Entered: 03/02/2020 09:12 AM]
|
|
Filing 23
Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Adam Perzow. New requested due date is 03/23/2020. [11613927] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 03/01/2020 07:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 19 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellee Moshe Hogeg. [11606980] (LA) [Entered: 02/24/2020 02:49 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 18 ] filed by Moshe Hogeg. [11605335] (SD) [Entered: 02/21/2020 04:19 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 18 ] submitted by Appellee Moshe Hogeg is filed. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 19 ] submitted by Appellee Moshe Hogeg are filed. The Court previously filed the opening brief [ # 13 ] and excerpts of record [ # 14 ] submitted by Appellant Adam Perzow. Within 7 days of this order, the filer of each brief is ordered to file 6 copies of that brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. The Form 18 certificate is available on the Court's website at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form18.pdf . The covers of the opening brief must be blue. The covers of the answering brief must be red. Within 7 days of this order, the filer of each set of excerpts of record is ordered to file 3 copies of that set of excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. The address for regular U.S. mail is P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. The address for overnight mail is 95 Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1526. [11599716] (SML) [Entered: 02/18/2020 11:14 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Moshe Hogeg. Date of service: 02/14/2020. [11598851] [19-55763] (Haeusler, Rita) [Entered: 02/14/2020 11:42 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Moshe Hogeg. Date of service: 02/14/2020. [11598848] [19-55763] (Haeusler, Rita) [Entered: 02/14/2020 11:38 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
Streamlined request [16] by Appellee Moshe Hogeg to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Joseph Chen, Does, Moshe Hogeg and Kenges Rakishev answering brief due 02/14/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11552062] (JN) [Entered: 01/06/2020 02:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Moshe Hogeg. New requested due date is 02/14/2020. [11551850] [19-55763] (Haeusler, Rita) [Entered: 01/06/2020 12:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 13 ] and excerpts of record [ # 14 ] submitted by Adam Perzow are filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [11535204] (SML) [Entered: 12/17/2019 11:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Adam Perzow. Date of service: 12/16/2019. [11534423] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 12/17/2019 12:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Adam Perzow. Date of service: 12/16/2019. [11534421] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
Streamlined request [11] by Appellant Adam Perzow to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Adam Perzow opening brief due 12/16/2019. Appellees Joseph Chen, Does, Moshe Hogeg and Kenges Rakishev answering brief due 01/15/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11498682] (JN) [Entered: 11/14/2019 09:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Adam Perzow. New requested due date is 12/11/2019. [11498333] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 11/13/2019 08:57 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): On August 28, 2019, the court dismissed this appeal for failure to prosecute because appellant had not responded to the July 16, 2019 order to show cause. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Appellant has now responded to the order to show cause. The motion to reinstate this appeal is granted (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]). The August 28, 2019 order is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated. Appellants response to the July 16, 2019 order demonstrates that the district court dismissed the remaining defendants on July 18, 2019. Accordingly, the order to show cause is discharged, and this appeal shall proceed. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due November 15, 2019; the answering brief is due December 16, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. (MOATT) [11456271] (OC) [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:25 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
Filed (ECF) Appellant Adam Perzow Motion to reinstate case after FRAP 42-1 dismissal. Date of service: 09/18/2019. [11436589] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 09/18/2019 10:44 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: ME) Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 07/16/2019). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11414333] (ME) [Entered: 08/28/2019 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11380524] (VS) [Entered: 07/30/2019 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SZ): It appears that the district courts order challenged in this appeal may not have disposed of the action as to all claims and all parties. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11365579] (AF) [Entered: 07/16/2019 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 07/29/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11363150] (VS) [Entered: 07/15/2019 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Adam Perzow Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/10/2019. [11359998] [19-55763] (Bowse, Michael) [Entered: 07/10/2019 08:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/10/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11359979][19-55763] (AD) [Entered: 07/10/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Moshe Hogeg Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/10/2019. [11359389] [19-55763] (Haeusler, Rita) [Entered: 07/10/2019 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/10/2019. Appellant Adam Perzow opening brief due 09/03/2019. Appellees Joseph Chen, Does, Moshe Hogeg and Kenges Rakishev answering brief due 10/03/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11354184] (RT) [Entered: 07/03/2019 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
