David Bock, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID BOCK and L. B., a minor by his Guardian Ad Litem Robert Powell
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DOE, Officer, 1, SALINAS, Officer and DOES, 2 through 10 inclusive
Case Number: 19-55872
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellants L. B. and David Bock to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants L. B. and David Bock opening brief due 10/30/2019. Appellees City of Los Angeles, Doe, Does and Salinas answering brief due 11/29/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11443429] (JN) [Entered: 09/25/2019 12:36 PM]
September 25, 2019 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants L. B. and David Bock. New requested due date is 10/30/2019. [11443403] [19-55872] (Cox, Donnie) [Entered: 09/25/2019 12:20 PM]
September 6, 2019 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11424182] (CL) [Entered: 09/06/2019 05:29 PM]
August 12, 2019 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 08/26/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11394327] (CL) [Entered: 08/12/2019 01:03 PM]
August 5, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/05/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11387909][19-55872] (AD) [Entered: 08/05/2019 06:44 PM]
August 5, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant David Bock Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/05/2019. [11387313] [19-55872] (Cox, Donnie) [Entered: 08/05/2019 02:14 PM]
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/05/2019. Appellants L. B. and David Bock opening brief due 09/30/2019. Appellees City of Los Angeles, Doe, Does and Salinas answering brief due 10/30/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11380081] (RT) [Entered: 07/29/2019 03:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Bock, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID BOCK
Represented By: Paul Leehey
Represented By: Donnie R. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: L. B., a minor by his Guardian Ad Litem Robert Powell
Represented By: Paul Leehey
Represented By: Donnie R. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Represented By: Janine K. Jeffery Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE, Officer, 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SALINAS, Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 2 through 10 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?