Thomas Atencio, et al v. Tunecore, Inc.
| TUNECORE, INC., a corporation |
| THOMAS ATENCIO, an adult individual and GIAN CATERINE, an adult individual, also known as John Cate |
| 19-55901 |
| August 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/09/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11393269][19-55901] (AD) [Entered: 08/09/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tunecore, Inc. in 19-55901 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/09/2019. [11392968] [19-55901, 19-55814] (Mead, Jessica) [Entered: 08/09/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/09/2019. First cross appeal brief due 10/24/2019 for Thomas Atencio and Gian Caterine. Second brief on cross appeal due 11/25/2019 for Tunecore, Inc.. Third brief on cross appeal due 12/26/2019 for Thomas Atencio and Gian Caterine. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for Tunecore, Inc. is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [11385772] [19-55901, 19-55814] (RT) [Entered: 08/02/2019 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
