Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen Rosas, et al
| A AND G INTERPRISES, LLC, a Califronia Limited Liability Company and DOES, 1-10 |
| CARMEN ROSAS |
| RAFAEL ARROYO, Jr. |
| 19-55974 |
| August 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) James S. Link for party(s) Appellee Carmen Rosas, in case 19-55974. [11411368] (QDL) [Entered: 08/27/2019 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney James S. Link in 19-55974 substituted by Attorneys Dennis J. Price II and Russell Clive Handy in 19-55974 [11411362] (QDL) [Entered: 08/27/2019 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorneys Russell Clive Handy and Dennis J. Price II in 19-55974 substituted by Attorney James S. Link in 19-55974 [11410529] (QDL) [Entered: 08/26/2019 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of James S. Link (James S. Link, Counselor & Advocate at Law, 215 N. Marengo Ave. 3rd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101) for Appellee Carmen Rosas. Substitution for Mr. Russell Clive Handy, Esquire for Appellant Rafael Arroyo, Jr. and Mr. Dennis J. Price, II, Esquire for Appellant Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. Date of service: 08/26/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: Yes) [11410513] [19-55974] (Link, James) [Entered: 08/26/2019 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Rafael Arroyo Jr. opening brief due 10/21/2019. Appellee Carmen Rosas answering brief due 11/18/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11404683] (JBS) [Entered: 08/21/2019 08:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
