Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
| CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, CONSUMERINFO.COM, INC., a California corporation, DIRECTV, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., a National Banking Association, WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES, a Iowa corporation, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, DFS SERVICES, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, G.E. CAPITAL FINANCIAL, CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, a Texas Corporation, FIRST PREMIER BANK, a National Banking Association, VERIZON WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., THE GAP, INC., California Corporation, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., a Kansas corporation, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC., a Delaware corporation, TD BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, STERLING JEWELERS, INC., a Delaware corporation, SYNCHRONY BANK, SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BILL ME LATER, INC., a Delaware corporation, NORTHLAND GROUP, INC., a Minnesota corporation, T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, RAC ACCEPTANCE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and APPLE, INC., a California corporation |
| TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank |
| MICHAEL P. TATRO |
| 19-56002 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, JHN and ADH) [11465235] (CW) [Entered: 10/16/2019 06:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11441227] (JPD) [Entered: 09/24/2019 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Michael P. Tatro motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/09/2019. [11432017] (CW) [Entered: 09/16/2019 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael P. Tatro opening brief due 10/25/2019. Appellees FDS Bank, FSB, Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and Target Corporate Services, Inc. answering brief due 11/25/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11412994] (JBS) [Entered: 08/28/2019 09:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
