Phillip Kaplan v. State of California, et al
| JACLYN LOWRY, Officer Badge 10#7390, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DUNAGAN, Mr. and Mrs. as private individuals, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DWIGHT DUNAGAN, Officer Badge 10#7390, LOWRY, Mr. and Mrs. as private individuals, ERIC MILLER, Police Officer Badge 10#6112, STATE LEGISLATORS, MILLER, Mr. and Mrs. as private individuals and DOES, A to Z Enterprises Unknown Owners |
| PHILLIP KAPLAN |
| 19-56067 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the September 9, 2019 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on January 28, 2019 or within the extended time to file a notice of appeal granted by the district court. See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11474928] (JBS) [Entered: 10/23/2019 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Phillip Kaplan motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/09/2019. [11427860] (JBS) [Entered: 09/11/2019 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Phillip Kaplan opening brief due 11/08/2019. Appellees City of San Diego, Does, Dunagan, Dwight Dunagan, Lowry, Jaclyn Lowry, Miller, Eric Miller, San Diego Police Department, State Legislators and State of California answering brief due 12/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11427852] (JBS) [Entered: 09/11/2019 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
