Seandell Jones v. C. Callahan
Respondent / Appellee: C. CALLAHAN
Petitioner / Appellant: SEANDELL LEE DUPREE JONES
Case Number: 19-56115
Filed: September 20, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Seandell Lee Dupree Jones motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/12/2019. [11451125] (CW) [Entered: 10/02/2019 10:27 AM]
September 20, 2019 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 08/15/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11438898] (JMR) [Entered: 09/20/2019 01:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Seandell Jones v. C. Callahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: C. CALLAHAN
Represented By: Heidi Salerno Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: SEANDELL LEE DUPREE JONES
Represented By: Seandell Lee Dupree Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?