Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARTEM KOSHKALDA, individually and as sole Shareholder and Transferee of ART, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON AMERICA, INC., SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Trustee: E. LYNN SCHOENMANN
Case Number: 19-56187
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 15, 2020 ARTEM KOSHKALDA V. SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2019 Filing 3 Received Appellant Artem Koshkalda designation of record. [11480058] (NAC) [Entered: 10/28/2019 01:52 PM]
October 25, 2019 Filing 2 Received Appellant Artem Koshkalda statement of issues to be present. [11479568] (NAC) [Entered: 10/28/2019 10:51 AM]
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Artem Koshkalda opening brief due 12/09/2019. Appellees Does, Epson America, Inc. and Seiko Epson Corporation answering brief due 01/09/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11459594] (RT) [Entered: 10/09/2019 02:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ARTEM KOSHKALDA, individually and as sole Shareholder and Transferee of ART, LLC
Represented By: Artem Koshkalda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EPSON AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Annie S. Wang
Represented By: Henry David
Represented By: J. Andrew Coombs
Represented By: Hayim Mayer Gamzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
Represented By: Annie S. Wang
Represented By: Henry David
Represented By: J. Andrew Coombs
Represented By: Hayim Mayer Gamzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Trustee: E. LYNN SCHOENMANN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?