Alexander Ramsey v. Amway Corporation, et al
| DOES, 1 through 20, inclusive, AMWAY CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, FAROUQUE KHATTAK, an individual and ALTICOR, INC., a Michigan corporation |
| ALEXANDER RAMSEY |
| 19-56203 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ALEXANDER RAMSEY V. AMWAY CORPORATION |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alexander Ramsey response to Court order dated 10/29/2019. Date of service: 11/18/2019. [11503166] [19-56203] (Marvazy, Azad) [Entered: 11/18/2019 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CJ): It appears that the district courts order challenged in this appeal may not have disposed of the action as to all claims and all parties. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1.Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11481747] (AF) [Entered: 10/29/2019 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/22/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11473933][19-56203] (AD) [Entered: 10/22/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alexander Ramsey Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/22/2019. [11473149] [19-56203] (Marvazy, Azad) [Entered: 10/22/2019 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/21/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11472189][19-56203] (AD) [Entered: 10/21/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees Alticor, Inc., Amway Corporation and Farouque Khattak Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/21/2019. [11471607] [19-56203] (Pedroza, Kenneth) [Entered: 10/21/2019 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/23/2019. Transcript ordered by 11/14/2019. Transcript due 12/16/2019. Appellant Alexander Ramsey opening brief due 01/23/2020. Appellees Alticor, Inc., Amway Corporation, Does and Farouque Khattak answering brief due 02/24/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11466340] (RT) [Entered: 10/16/2019 01:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.