Miguel Lopez-Mendoza v. William Barr
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-MENDOZA |
| 19-56233 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AR): Petitioner-Appellants motion to withdraw the previously filed emergency motion for stay of removal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. The emergency motion for stay of removal (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is withdrawn. Petitioner-Appellants motion for an enlargement of time to file an opening brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is granted. The briefing schedule is now as follows: petitioner-appellants opening brief is due on February 21, 2020; respondent-appellees answering brief is due March 23, 2020; and petitioner-appellants optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11509684] (WL) [Entered: 11/22/2019 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 02/21/2020. Date of service: 11/19/2019. [11504705] [19-56233] (Bakeman, Willard) [Entered: 11/19/2019 08:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza Motion for miscellaneous relief [withdrawal of motion]. Date of service: 11/19/2019. [11504704] [19-56233] (Bakeman, Willard) [Entered: 11/19/2019 08:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee William P. Barr response opposing motion ([ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 11/18/2019. [11502517] [19-56233] (Thayer, Damon) [Entered: 11/18/2019 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AR): The court has received appellants emergency motion for stay of removal pending appeal. Appellees response to the motion is due November 18, 2019. Appellants optional reply in support of the motion is due by November 19, 2019. [11500247] (WL) [Entered: 11/15/2019 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza EMERGENCY Motion for stay of removal. Date of service: 10/31/2019. [11498633] [19-56233]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 11/19/2019 by SLM] (Bakeman, Willard) [Entered: 11/14/2019 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Miguel Angel Lopez-Mendoza opening brief due 12/23/2019. Appellee William P. Barr, Attorney General answering brief due 01/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11477798] (HC) [Entered: 10/25/2019 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Miguel Lopez-Mendoza v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Damon Thayer |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-MENDOZA | |
| Represented By: | Willard Patrick Bakeman III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
