Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
| DANIEL PARAMO, Warden |
| RAUL ARELLANO |
| 19-56330 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Raul Arellano notice DC denied COA. [11555152] (RR) [Entered: 01/08/2020 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received Appellant Raul Arellano notice DC has denied COA. [11555148] (RR) [Entered: 01/08/2020 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/04/2019. Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253; Pham, 400 F.3d at 742. The Certificates of Appealability as to ECF Nos. 117 and 131 are DENIED[11522832] [19-56330, 18-56331] (RR) [Entered: 12/05/2019 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The district court has not issued or declined to issue a certificate of appealability in these appeals, which appears to arise from the November 1, 2019 denial of petitioners motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). See Lynch v. Blodgett, 999 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1993) (certificate of probable cause to appeal necessary to appeal denial of post-judgment motion for relief under Rule 60(b)). Accordingly, these cases are remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify which issue or issues meet the required showing. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. Under Asrar, if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court should state its reasons why a certificate of appealability should not be granted, and the Clerk of the district court shall forward to this court the record with the order denying the certificate. See Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the district court judge. (Pro Se) [11507667] [19-56330, 19-56331] (CKP) [Entered: 11/21/2019 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11502714] (RT) [Entered: 11/18/2019 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DANIEL PARAMO, Warden | |
| Represented By: | David Delgado-Rucci Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RAUL ARELLANO | |
| Represented By: | Raul Arellano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
