Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellee: DROPBOX, INC., a Delaware corporation
Case Number: 19-56347
Filed: November 20, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 20, 2021 Summary Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc.
July 6, 2021 Summary IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. DROPBOX, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2019 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11537128] (CL) [Entered: 12/18/2019 12:35 PM]
December 2, 2019 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/18/2019, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11517999] (CL) [Entered: 12/02/2019 03:38 PM]
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/26/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11513180]. [19-56347] (AD) [Entered: 11/26/2019 12:44 PM]
November 26, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/26/2019. [11512782] [19-56347] (Venezia, Matthew) [Entered: 11/26/2019 10:35 AM]
November 20, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/27/2019. Transcript ordered by 12/18/2019. Transcript due 01/17/2020. Appellant Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. opening brief due 02/26/2020. Appellee Dropbox, Inc. answering brief due 03/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11505047] (RT) [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:02 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: IRONHAWK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Keith J. Wesley
Represented By: Matthew L. Venezia
Represented By: Lori Sambol Brody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DROPBOX, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Clara Shin
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Davidson Esquire
Represented By: Rebecca A. Jacobs
Represented By: Matthew Verdin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?