Curtis Philbert v. Robert Wilkie
| CURTIS W. PHILBERT |
| DAVID I. SHULKIN, Secretary of Veterans Affair and ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affair |
| 19-56396 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CURTIS PHILBERT V. DENIS MCDONOUGH |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and MILAN D. SMITH, JR.) : Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ] ) is denied because a review of the record indicates that this appeal lacks sufficient merit to warrant the appointment of counsel. See Bradshaw v. Zoological Socy of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1318-19 (9th Cir. 1981). No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. The opening brief is due March 5, 2020; the answering brief is due April 6, 2020; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, the excerpts of record requirement is waived. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.2. Appellees supplemental excerpts of record are limited to the district court docket sheet, the notice of appeal, the judgment or order appealed from, and any specific portions of the record cited in appellees brief. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.7. [11572427] (RT) [Entered: 01/23/2020 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 Appellee David I. Shulkin in 19-56396 substituted by Appellee Robert Wilkie in 19-56396 [11564394] (SLM) [Entered: 01/16/2020 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 7 Attorney Karen Ruckert substituted by Attorney Damon Thayer in 19-56396. [11527877] (HH) [Entered: 12/10/2019 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Damon Thayer (United States Attorney Office, Federal Building, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Rm. 7516, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellee David I. Shulkin. Substitution for Attorney Karen Ruckert, Esquire for Appellee David I. Shulkin. Date of service: 12/10/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11527871] [19-56396] (Thayer, Damon) [Entered: 12/10/2019 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance (ECF Filing) [4] is rejected. Filer is not permitted to file on behalf of another attorney. Each attorney must file their own notice of appearance. [11527796] (HH) [Entered: 12/10/2019 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Damon Thayer (United States Attorney's Office, Federal Building, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Rm. 7516, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellee David I. Shulkin. Substitution for Attorney Karen Ruckert, Esquire for Appellee David I. Shulkin. Date of service: 12/10/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11527744] [19-56396] (Ben-Shmuel, Eliezer) [Entered: 12/10/2019 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Curtis W. Philbert Unopposed Motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. Date of service: 12/09/2019. [11526522] [19-56396] (Philbert, Curtis) [Entered: 12/09/2019 07:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 12/03/2019. [11519444] (BY) [Entered: 12/03/2019 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 12/26/2019. Transcript due 01/27/2020. Appellant Curtis W. Philbert opening brief due 03/05/2020. Appellee David I. Shulkin answering brief due 04/06/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11515433] (JPD) [Entered: 11/27/2019 04:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
