Bulmario Torres v. S. Kernan

Bulmario Torres v. S. Kernan

Petitioner:	BULMARIO TORRES
Respondent / Appellee:	S. KERNAN
Case Number:	19-56424
Filed:	December 6, 2019
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
January 24, 2020	Filing 2 Filed order (JEROME FARRIS and MARY H. MURGUIA): The request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. In order for a district court to consider a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition, this court must first authorize the district court to consider that petition. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3). The Clerk will serve this order and a copy of the standard form application for leave to file a second or successive petition on appellant. DENIED. [11573335] (AF) [Entered: 01/24/2020 11:23 AM]
December 6, 2019	Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/10/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11524057] (JMR) [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:55 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

January 24, 2020

Filing 2 Filed order (JEROME FARRIS and MARY H. MURGUIA): The request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. In order for a district court to consider a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition, this court must first authorize the district court to consider that petition. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3). The Clerk will serve this order and a copy of the standard form application for leave to file a second or successive petition on appellant. DENIED. [11573335] (AF) [Entered: 01/24/2020 11:23 AM]

December 6, 2019

Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/10/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11524057] (JMR) [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bulmario Torres v. S. Kernan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: BULMARIO TORRES
Represented By:	Bulmario Torres
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: S. KERNAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?