Dolores Gaines, et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC, et al
| DOLORES GAINES, an individual, MARIO HALL, Jr., an individual and RYAN BAGSBY, an individual |
| DOES, 1 through 50 inclusive and EMMANUEL MORALES, an Individual |
| AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company |
| KENYATA MARTIN, an individual and BRANISHA NEWBERRY, an individual |
| 19-56473 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellant AT&T Mobility Services LLC to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant AT&T Mobility Services LLC opening brief due 03/19/2020. Appellees Kenyata Martin and Branisha Newberry answering brief due 04/20/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11566003] (JN) [Entered: 01/17/2020 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant AT&T Mobility Services LLC. New requested due date is 03/19/2020. [11565878] [19-56473] (Gage, Kenneth) [Entered: 01/17/2020 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11565414] (VS) [Entered: 01/16/2020 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Terry Chapko for party(s) Appellee Branisha Newberry and Appellee Kenyata Martin, in case 19-56473. [11553738] (QDL) [Entered: 01/07/2020 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Terry J. Chapko (The Law Office of Terry J Chapko 120 C Avenue, Suite 120 Coronado, CA 92118) for Appellees Kenyata Martin and Branisha Newberry. Date of service: 01/07/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11553685] [19-56473] (Chapko, Terry) [Entered: 01/07/2020 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 01/16/2020, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11548940] (BLS) [Entered: 01/02/2020 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/27/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11545267]. [19-56473] (AD) [Entered: 12/27/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant AT&T Mobility Services LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/27/2019. [11545139] [19-56473] (Gunning, Daniel) [Entered: 12/27/2019 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant AT&T Mobility Services LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/27/2019. Appellant AT&T Mobility Services LLC opening brief due 02/18/2020. Appellees Kenyata Martin and Branisha Newberry answering brief due 03/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11539516] (JBS) [Entered: 12/20/2019 09:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
