Immanuel Sanchez v. State of California, et al
| WILSHIRE CENTER DENTAL GROUP, RICHARD BRACKEN, individual and official capacity, ARTHUR DANIELS, individual and official capacity, DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, OSCAR A. ROMERO, Clinica Monsenor, EL MONTE COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM LIGHTBOURNE, individual and official capacity, ARMEN PEZESHKIAN, individual and official capacity, GREGORY KAPLAN, individual and official capacity, DONNA RAJA, individual and official capacity, HERMAN OSTROW SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY OF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, a corporation, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a public entity, JULIO INIQUEZ, individual and official capacity, TALLEY MARLENE, individual and official capacity, MARIA MARZAN, individual and official capacity, LOS ANGELES COUNTY USC MEDICAL CENTER, WEST COAST DENTAL SERVICES, DONOVAN SITHAN, individual and official capacity, LEANDRO S. ARCA, individual and official capacity, JONATHAN Y. HSU, individual and official capacity and STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
| IMMANUEL F. SANCHEZ |
| 19-56502 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Immanuel F. Sanchez 2nd response to to set response by any party to anything. Served on 01/26/2020. [11581934] (CW) [Entered: 02/03/2020 08:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Immanuel F. Sanchez response to 1/7/20 order. Served on 01/26/2020. [11581932] (CW) [Entered: 02/03/2020 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Immanuel F. Sanchez 2nd motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/26/2020. [11581927] (CW) [Entered: 02/03/2020 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): This appeal challenges the district courts November 15, 2019 order, entered on the district court docket on November 27, 2019, denying appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his complaint. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11552947] (JPD) [Entered: 01/07/2020 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/02/2020 denying ifp. [11548996] (CW) [Entered: 01/02/2020 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Immanuel F. Sanchez motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/16/2019. [11544075] (JPD) [Entered: 12/26/2019 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Immanuel F. Sanchez opening brief due 02/14/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11543870] (JPD) [Entered: 12/26/2019 08:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
