Robert Snyder v. Kathleen Allison, et al
A. MONDET, RJD Education Supervisor, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, CDCR Secretary and C. TISCORNIA, Facility - A Librarian |
ROBERT R. SNYDER |
19-56521 |
December 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, MDS and NRS) [11599548] (RR) [Entered: 02/18/2020 10:39 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and N. RANDY SMITH): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11575589] (AF) [Entered: 01/27/2020 03:55 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Robert R. Snyder supplemental motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11561463] (RR) [Entered: 01/14/2020 10:59 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Robert R. Snyder motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11561455] (RR) [Entered: 01/14/2020 10:57 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert R. Snyder opening brief due 02/24/2020. [11546902] (RT) [Entered: 12/30/2019 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.