In re: Jan Glaser, et al v. Shelley D. Krohn, et al
| TATYANA KHOMYAKOVA and JAN GLASER |
| SHELLEY D. KROHN, Chapter 7 Trustee |
| In re: JAN GLASER |
| 19-60015 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator by emailshould circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11306813] (VS) [Entered: 05/23/2019 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 11 Streamlined request [10] by Appellant Shelley D. Krohn to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Shelley D. Krohn opening brief due 06/27/2019. Appellees Jan Glaser and Tatyana Khomyakova answering brief due 07/29/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11299744] (DLM) [Entered: 05/16/2019 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Shelley D. Krohn. New requested due date is 06/27/2019. [11299728] [19-60015] (McPherson, Jeanette) [Entered: 05/16/2019 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - FurtherConference, w/ counsel for appellant only, 05/14/2019, 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [11284354] (VS) [Entered: 05/02/2019 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Shelley D. Krohn letter dated re: stmnt of issues, designation of RTs. NAN. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11261214] (CW) [Entered: 04/11/2019 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - AssessmentConference, 05/01/2019, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11261163] (VS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/03/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11251629] (AD) [Entered: 04/03/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Lenard E. Schwartzer for Shelley D. Krohn, in case 19-60015. [11251514] (CW) [Entered: 04/03/2019 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lenard Elliott Schwartzer for Appellant Shelley D. Krohn. Date of service: 04/03/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11251489] [19-60015] (Schwartzer, Lenard) [Entered: 04/03/2019 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Shelley D. Krohn Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/03/2019. [11251073] [19-60015] (McPherson, Jeanette) [Entered: 04/03/2019 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 BAP Payment of docket fee received. Receipt or check number: 001020. Date paid: 04/01/2019. Amount paid: USD 505.00. Fee status: [Case Number 19-60015: Paid]. [11248839] (DB) [Entered: 04/01/2019 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/03/2019. Appellant Shelley D. Krohn opening brief due 05/28/2019. Appellees Jan Glaser and Tatyana Khomyakova answering brief due 06/27/2019 Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. (BG) [Entered: 03/27/2019 09:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
