In re: Laura James, et al v. Viktoria Kirakosian
| LAURA KAY JAMES and JAKE GUILLERMO JAMES |
| VIKTORIA KIRAKOSIAN |
| In re: LAURA KAY JAMES |
| 19-60018 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LAURA JAMES V. VIKTORIA KIRAKOSIAN |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Received notice of change of address dated 10/20/2019 from Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James. New address: 115 West California Blvd., #9146, Pasadena, CA 91105. [11477195]--[Edited: address updated. 10/24/2019 by SLM] (RR) [Entered: 10/24/2019 04:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
Terminated Scott D. Olsen for Viktoria Kirakosian in 19-60018 (Pursuant to email from counsel). [11446071] (TYL) [Entered: 09/27/2019 11:03 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SZ): Court records do not reflect receipt of the answering brief or a letter stating that no brief will be filed. Within 14 days from the date of this notice, appellee shall simultaneously submit the answering brief and file a motion to file a late brief, or file correspondence to the court indicating that no answering brief will be filed. In the absence of a timely response to this order, the case will be calendared on the basis of the opening brief alone, and appellee will not be heard at oral argument unless the court grants permission. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(c); 9th Cir. R. 31-2.3. Appellants motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) appellees adversary proceeding judgment is referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal for whatever consideration the panel deems appropriate. [11443980] (AF) [Entered: 09/25/2019 04:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
Received copy of motion filed in Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California re: ex-parte motion for order recalling and quashing, or in the alternative, staying the writ of execution obtained by Plaintiff Kirakosian. Motion filed by Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James. [11437095] (RR) [Entered: 09/19/2019 11:13 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
Filed Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James motion to dismiss [Appellee's Adversary Proceeding Judgment] for writ of prosecution. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/30/2019. [11425869] (RR) [Entered: 09/09/2019 04:36 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
Filed original and 3 copies of Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James (Informal: No) opening brief of 10 pages. 1 copy of unbound excerpts of record. Served on 05/22/2019. [11349410] (LA) [Entered: 06/28/2019 06:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
Filed order (N. RANDY SMITH and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. The Clerk shall file the opening brief received on May 28, 2019 (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]). The answering brief is due August 9, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellants are proceeding without counsel, the excerpts of record requirement is waived. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.2. Appellees supplemental excerpts of record are limited to the district court docket sheet, the notice of appeal, the judgment or order appealed from, and any specific portions of the record cited in the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.7. [11346046] (AF) [Entered: 06/26/2019 04:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND): Appellants emergency motion for a stay pending appeal is denied (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]). See Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987). The opening brief was received on May 28, 2019. The briefing schedule remains stayed pending disposition of appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for appointment of counsel, which will be addressed by separate order. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11(a)(4), (6). [11325181] (AF) [Entered: 06/10/2019 01:37 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): The court has received appellants emergency motion for a stay pending appeal. Appellees response to the stay motion is due June 5, 2019. Appellants optional reply is due June 7, 2019. Briefing is stayed pending disposition of appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which will be addressed by separate order. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11(a)(4). [11312367] (AF) [Entered: 05/29/2019 02:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
Received original and 3 copies of Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James opening brief (Informal: No) of 10 pages. 1 copy of unbound excerpts of record. Served on 05/22/2019. Major deficiencies: motions for ifp and appointment of counsel pending (briefing stayed). [11312562] (LA) [Entered: 05/29/2019 04:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
Filed Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James EMERGENCY motion for stay pending appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/22/2019. [11310834] (RR) [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
Filed Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/01/2019. [11312196] (BG) [Entered: 05/29/2019 02:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
ENTRY UPDATED. Filed motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/01/2019. [11254003]--[Edited 05/29/2019 by BG]--[Edited: attached corrected PDF of IFP motion only. 05/29/2019 by RY] (BG) [Entered: 04/05/2019 09:07 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF APPELLANTS IN PRO SE AND COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. Setting schedule as follows: Appellants Jake Guillermo James and Laura Kay James opening brief due 05/28/2019. Appellee Viktoria Kirakosian answering brief due 06/27/2019 Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11253991] (BG) [Entered: 04/05/2019 09:00 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
