In re: Ae Sook Kang v. Cuzco Development U.S.A., LLC
| AE SOOK KANG |
| In re: CUZCO DEVELOPMENT U.S.A., LLC |
| CUZCO DEVELOPMENT U.S.A., LLC |
| 19-60026 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the docket reflects that appellant has failed to respond to the court's May 28, 2019 order to show cause. The court sua sponte grants appellant an extension of time to respond to the order to show cause. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall file a response to the May 28, 2019 order to show cause. If appellant elects to show cause, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. The Clerk shall send a copy of the May 28, 2019 order to appellant along with this order. [11358276] (CKP) [Entered: 07/09/2019 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-60026: Paid] ). Check number: 573. [11349200] (DB) [Entered: 06/28/2019 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): The judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) was entered on the docket on April 4, 2019. Appellants notice of appeal was received by this court on May 13, 2019 and filed in the BAP on May 17, 2019. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the BAPs judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c), 6(b); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11310225] (CKP) [Entered: 05/28/2019 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF APPELLANT IN PRO SE AND COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. Setting schedule as follows: Appellant Ae Sook Kang opening brief due 07/16/2019. Appellee Cuzco Development U.S.A., LLC answering brief due 08/15/2019 Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11302470] (BG) [Entered: 05/20/2019 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
