Chikako Cutlip v. Chih-Shih Lin, et alIn re: Chikako Cutlip v. Chih-Shih Lin, et al
Appellee: SHENG-MEI LIN, DEVIN DERHAM-BURK, Chapter 13, Trustee, RAY J. LIN, CHIH-SHIH LIN and CHARLIE CHANG
Appellant: CHIKAKO KUNIYOSHI CUTLIP
Debtor: In re: CHIKAKO KUNIYOSHI CUTLIP
Case Number: 19-60047
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Chikako Kuniyoshi Cutlip motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis (attached to NOA) . Deficiencies: None. Served on. [11436278] (BG) [Entered: 09/18/2019 03:24 PM]
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF APPELLANT IN PRO SE AND COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. Setting schedule as follows: Appellant Chikako Kuniyoshi Cutlip opening brief due 11/12/2019. Appellees Charlie Chang, Devin Derham-Burk, Chih-Shih Lin, Ray J. Lin and Sheng-Mei Lin answering brief due 12/12/2019 Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11436261] (BG) [Entered: 09/18/2019 03:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chikako Cutlip v. Chih-Shih Lin, et alIn re: Chikako Cutlip v. Chih-Shih Lin, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: SHENG-MEI LIN
Represented By: Kevin A. Harris Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: DEVIN DERHAM-BURK, Chapter 13, Trustee
Represented By: Devin Derham-Burk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: RAY J. LIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: CHIH-SHIH LIN
Represented By: Kevin A. Harris Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: CHARLIE CHANG
Represented By: Kevin A. Harris Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: CHIKAKO KUNIYOSHI CUTLIP
Represented By: Chikako Kuniyoshi Cutlip
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: In re: CHIKAKO KUNIYOSHI CUTLIP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?