Jose Gomez-Fernandez v. William Barr
| JOSE CARMEN GOMEZ-FERNANDEZ, AKA Jobe Carmen Gomez, AKA Jose Carmen Gomez, AKA Jose Gomez Carmen |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 19-70079 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Certified Administrative Record by Executive Office of Immigration Review. [11218074] [19-70079] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 03/06/2019 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 Matthew G. Whitaker substituted by William P. Barr effective 02/14/2019. [Created 02/15/2019 by AUTOUPD][11197605] (CD) [Entered: 02/15/2019 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Petitioner Jose Carmen Gomez-Fernandez Supplemental Motion to stay removal. Date of service: 01/25/2019. [11167822] [19-70079] (Berke, Robert) [Entered: 01/25/2019 06:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 Fee Paid by Petitioner Jose Carmen Gomez-Fernandez. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A09-94845-94. [11151942] [19-70079] (Berke, Robert) [Entered: 01/14/2019 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Regina Byrd for Matthew G. Whitaker, in case 19-70079. [11148230] (NAC) [Entered: 01/10/2019 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Regina Byrd for Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker. Substitution for Chief Counsel ICE for Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker and OIL for Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker. Date of service: 01/10/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11148224] [19-70079] (Byrd, Regina) [Entered: 01/10/2019 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11147709] (CD) [Entered: 01/09/2019 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA PETITION FOR REVIEW AND MOTION FOR STAY. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4 (c)(1)(3) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detention status: Detained. The schedule is set as follows: Certified Administrative Record due 03/06/2019. Response to motion for stay due 04/03/2019 for Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General. [11147678] (RT) [Entered: 01/09/2019 05:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jose Gomez-Fernandez v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE CARMEN GOMEZ-FERNANDEZ, AKA Jobe Carmen Gomez, AKA Jose Carmen Gomez, AKA Jose Gomez Carmen | |
| Represented By: | Robert G. Berke Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Regina Byrd Esquire |
| Represented By: | Chief Counsel ICE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
