Eric Drake v. USDC-CAOAK
Petitioner: ERIC DRAKE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Other: In re: ERIC DRAKE
Undetermined: SEDGWICK MANAGEMENT CLAIM SERVICES, INC. and SAFEWAY INC
Case Number: 19-70370
Filed: February 13, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Filing 4 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and PAUL J. WATFORD): Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. All other requests contained in Docket Entry No. [ # 1 ] are denied. Petitioners emergency motion for stay (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as unnecessary. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [11249716] (AF) [Entered: 04/02/2019 10:25 AM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 3 Filed Petitioner Eric Drake motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/12/2019. [11189414][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/14/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:16 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Eric Drake EMERGENCY motion to stay lower court action. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/12/2019. [11189406][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/14/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:14 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 1 FILED PROSE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11189396][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/14/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eric Drake v. USDC-CAOAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ERIC DRAKE
Represented By: Eric Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Other: In re: ERIC DRAKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: SEDGWICK MANAGEMENT CLAIM SERVICES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: SAFEWAY INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?