Frederick Shull, Jr. v. USDC-NVL
| FREDERICK H. SHULL, Jr. |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS |
| GREGORY MCGHEE, in his individual as well as official capacities, OCHSNER MEDICAL GROUP, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LEONARDO SEOANE, head Ochsner Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND and GEOFF MCCOLL |
| In re: FREDERICK H. SHULL, Jr. |
| 19-70375 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Petitioner Frederick H. Shull, Jr. supplemental petition for writ of mandamus. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/03/2019. [11255752] (QDL) [Entered: 04/08/2019 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Petitioner Frederick H. Shull, Jr. plaintiff's declaration: an appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Paper filing deficiency: None. Served on 03/30/2019. [11254834] (QDL) [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioner Frederick H. Shull, Jr. motion petitioning appellate court order the U.S. Nevada District Court to answer writ. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/27/2019. [11249634] (QDL) [Entered: 04/02/2019 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Frederick H. Shull, Jr. affidavit in support of plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate. Paper filing deficiency: None. Served on 03/19/2019. [11239631] (QDL) [Entered: 03/22/2019 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PROSE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11189590][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/14/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 02/13/2019 04:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
