Dario Rodriguez v. USDC-NVL
| DARIO RODRIGUEZ |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS |
| E.K. MCDANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| In re: DARIO RODRIGUEZ |
| 19-70581 |
| March 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and PAUL J. WATFORD) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed petition. DENIED. [11273791] (HC) [Entered: 04/23/2019 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Dario Rodriguez motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/19/2019. [11244173] (QDL) [Entered: 03/27/2019 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11223371][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 03/12/2019 by BY] (JBS) [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
