Christopher Lipsey v. Christian Pfeiffer
| CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY |
| CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden |
| 19-70649 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Christopher Lipsey supplemental second or successive petition filed. Deficiencies: None. [11264521] (JFF) [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 Application for leave to file a second or successive petition filed. (Research) [11232140][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 03/19/2019 by BY](Orignal sent to SMS) (JMR) [Entered: 03/18/2019 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Christopher Lipsey v. Christian Pfeiffer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Lipsey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
