Jaime Lopez-Vellez v. William Barr
JAIME GUSTAVO LOPEZ-VELLEZ, AKA Hector Garcia Vargas |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
19-70707 |
March 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion to stay removal pending review. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c), the temporary stay of removal continues in effect until issuance of the mandate or further order of the court. The certified administrative record has been filed. The opening brief is due August 12, 2019; the answering brief is due October 11, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11300167] (AF) [Entered: 05/16/2019 01:16 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Respondent William P. Barr response non-opposing motion/form/notice at [ # 1 ] For Stay Removal Motion. Date of service: 05/09/2019. I certify that I have separately notified all parties not registered for Appellate Electronic Filing in this case with notice of this non-opposition. [11291932] [19-70707] (Twombly, Monica) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:49 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Certified Administrative Record by Executive Office of Immigration Review. [11260704] [19-70707] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:37 AM] |
Filing 4 Added attorney Monica Marie Twombly for William P. Barr, in case 19-70707. [11242685] (CW) [Entered: 03/26/2019 01:02 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Monica M. Twombly for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 03/26/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11242675] [19-70707] (Twombly, Monica) [Entered: 03/26/2019 12:57 PM] |
Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11241819] (CD) [Entered: 03/25/2019 05:40 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 05/20/2019. Response to motion for stay due 06/17/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. [11240238] (BY) [Entered: 03/25/2019 08:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jaime Lopez-Vellez v. William Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Chief Counsel ICE |
Represented By: | Monica Marie Twombly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JAIME GUSTAVO LOPEZ-VELLEZ, AKA Hector Garcia Vargas | |
Represented By: | Inna Lipkin Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.