Raul Arellano v. USDC-CASD
| RAUL ARELLANO |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO |
| DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and MICHAEL BALBIN SANTOS, Primary Care Provider (Doctor) |
| In re: RAUL ARELLANO |
| 19-70851 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Petitioner Raul Arellano letter dated 05/31/2019 re: case status. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent copy of docket sheet) [11321085] (RL) [Entered: 06/05/2019 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners alternate request to construe this petition as a notice of appeal is denied. See Religious Tech. Ctr., Church of Scientology Intl, Inc. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306, 1308 (9th Cir. 1989) (Ordinarily, an appeal does not lie from the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order . . . .). The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [11317696] (OC) [Entered: 06/03/2019 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Raul Arellano to be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/17/2019. [11273322] (RL) [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE PETITIONER. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11256677][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 04/09/2019 by BY] (HC) [Entered: 04/08/2019 03:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
