Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa v. William Barr
Petitioner: FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA, AKA Diana Elizabeth Padilla
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Case Number: 19-70929
Filed: April 16, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2019 Filing 8 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) The governments motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted because this court has jurisdiction to review only final orders of removal. See, e.g., 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(1); Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002) (order). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11311762] (WL) [Entered: 05/29/2019 11:06 AM]
May 13, 2019 Filing 7 Filed Petitioner Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [11299345] (RR) [Entered: 05/15/2019 05:32 PM]
May 13, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Petitioner Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [11299342] (RR) [Entered: 05/15/2019 05:29 PM]
May 2, 2019 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Respondent William P. Barr Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 05/02/2019. [11284293] [19-70929] (Conway, Kevin) [Entered: 05/02/2019 08:52 AM]
April 18, 2019 Filing 4 Added attorney Kevin Conway for William P. Barr, in case 19-70929. [11268742] (RR) [Entered: 04/18/2019 12:58 PM]
April 18, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kevin J. Conway for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 04/18/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11268392] [19-70929] (Conway, Kevin) [Entered: 04/18/2019 10:30 AM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/10/2019. [11265655][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 04/16/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:02 PM]
April 15, 2019 Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. PRO SE. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 05/20/2019. Petitioner opening brief due 07/19/2019 for Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa. Respondent brief due 09/17/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11265653][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached - Including Under Seal Documents, resent NDA,--[Edited 04/16/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa v. William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA, AKA Diana Elizabeth Padilla
Represented By: Francisca Rodriguez Gamboa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Represented By: Kevin Conway Esquire
Represented By: Chief Counsel ICE
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?