Gilberto Romero-Zaragoza v. William Barr
GILBERTO ROMERO-ZARAGOZA |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
19-70959 |
April 19, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion to stay removal pending review. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c), the temporary stay of removal continues in effect until issuance of the mandate or further order of the court. The certified administrative record has been filed. The opening brief is due July 23, 2019; the answering brief is due September 23, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11331943] (OC) [Entered: 06/14/2019 01:02 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Respondent William P. Barr response non-opposing motion ([ # 1 ] For Stay Removal Motion). Date of service: 06/10/2019. [11325477] [19-70959] (Glaser, Sheri) [Entered: 06/10/2019 02:52 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Certified Administrative Record by Executive Office of Immigration Review. [11289231] [19-70959] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 05/07/2019 12:07 PM] |
Filing 4 Added attorney Sheri Robyn Glaser for William P. Barr. [11273361] (RL) [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:15 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 04/23/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11272995] [19-70959] (Glaser, Sheri) [Entered: 04/23/2019 07:00 AM] |
Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11271028] (CD) [Entered: 04/19/2019 05:40 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 05/24/2019. Response to motion for stay due 06/14/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 07/23/2019 for Gilberto Romero-Zaragoza. Respondent brief due 09/23/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11270764][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 04/22/2019 by BY] (JBS) [Entered: 04/19/2019 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gilberto Romero-Zaragoza v. William Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: GILBERTO ROMERO-ZARAGOZA | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Torres |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Sheri Robyn Glaser |
Represented By: | Chief Counsel ICE |
Represented By: | OIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.