Juan Mora v. William Barr
| JUAN CARLOS MORA |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 19-71000 |
| April 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) Petitioner does not seek review of any final order of removal issued by the agency. We have jurisdiction to review only final orders of removal. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(1); Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002) (order). Accordingly, we grant the governments motion to dismiss this petition (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]), to which no opposition has been filed. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal will terminate upon issuance of the mandate. DISMISSED. [11315234] (WL) [Entered: 05/31/2019 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Respondent William P. Barr Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and Response opposing motion ([ # 1 ] For Stay Removal Motion). Date of service: 04/29/2019. [11280484] [19-71000] (Vanderstar, Thankful) [Entered: 04/29/2019 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Thankful Vanderstar for William P. Barr, in case 19-71000. [11279822] (CW) [Entered: 04/29/2019 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Thankful T. Vanderstar for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 04/29/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11279811] [19-71000] (Vanderstar, Thankful) [Entered: 04/29/2019 07:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11278007] (CD) [Entered: 04/25/2019 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 05/29/2019. Response to motion for stay due 06/19/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 07/29/2019 for Juan Carlos Mora. Respondent brief due 09/26/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11276435] (BY) [Entered: 04/25/2019 07:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Juan Mora v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS MORA | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Ying-Chi Chan Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Chief Counsel ICE |
| Represented By: | Thankful Vanderstar |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
