Jennifer Castro-Martinez, et al v. William Barr
| CINDY BERENICE BELTRAN-CASTRO and JENNIFER LYSET CASTRO-MARTINEZ |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 19-71026 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Added attorney Laura M.L. Maroldy for William P. Barr, in case 19-71026. [11282122] (RR) [Entered: 04/30/2019 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Laura Maroldy for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 04/30/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11281762] [19-71026] (Maroldy, Laura) [Entered: 04/30/2019 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11279557] (CD) [Entered: 04/26/2019 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. COUNSELED. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 05/31/2019. Petitioner opening brief due 07/30/2019 for Cindy Berenice Beltran-Castro and Jennifer Lyset Castro-Martinez. Respondent brief due 09/30/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11279248] (JBS) [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
