Rodrigo Lopez-Nepomuceno v. William Barr
| RODRIGO LOPEZ-NEPOMUCENO |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 19-71143 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| RODRIGO LOPEZ-NEPOMUCENO V. MERRICK GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Continues temporary stay of removal pursuant to General Order 6.4 (c). Petitioner opening brief due 08/13/2019 for Rodrigo Lopez-Nepomuceno. Respondent brief due 10/15/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of the answering brief. [11356029] (NA) [Entered: 07/08/2019 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Respondent William P. Barr response non-opposing motion ([ # 1 ] For Stay Removal Motion). Date of service: 07/03/2019. [11353238] [19-71143] (Alexander, Gerald) [Entered: 07/03/2019 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Certified Administrative Record by Executive Office of Immigration Review. [11317132] [19-71143] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Gerald M. Alexander for William P. Barr, in case 19-71143. [11297448] (JFF) [Entered: 05/14/2019 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gerald M. Alexander for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 05/14/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11296270] [19-71143] (Alexander, Gerald) [Entered: 05/14/2019 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11294091] (CD) [Entered: 05/10/2019 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 06/14/2019. Response to motion for stay due 07/05/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 08/13/2019 for Rodrigo Lopez-Nepomuceno. Respondent brief due 10/15/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11293544] (JMR) [Entered: 05/10/2019 01:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rodrigo Lopez-Nepomuceno v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RODRIGO LOPEZ-NEPOMUCENO | |
| Represented By: | Henry Cruz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Chief Counsel ICE |
| Represented By: | Gerald M. Alexander |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
