Alfredo Magana Arreguin v. William Barr
| ALFREDO MAGANA ARREGUIN |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 19-71192 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Respondent William P. Barr response opposing motion ([ # 1 ] For Stay Removal Motion). Date of service: 07/08/2019. [11355877] [19-71192] (Melnik, Karen) [Entered: 07/08/2019 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Certified Administrative Record by Executive Office of Immigration Review. [11319081] [19-71192] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 06/04/2019 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Petitioner Alfredo Magana Arreguin motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None [11318302] (NAC) [Entered: 06/04/2019 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Petitioner Alfredo Magana Arreguin motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11318300] (NAC) [Entered: 06/04/2019 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Karen L. Melnik for William P. Barr, in case 19-71192. [11300883] (NAC) [Entered: 05/17/2019 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Karen L. Melnik for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 05/17/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11300858] [19-71192] (Melnik, Karen) [Entered: 05/17/2019 05:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioner Alfredo Magana Arreguin motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/09/2019. [11298651][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 05/16/2019 by BY] (JBS) [Entered: 05/15/2019 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Alfredo Magana Arreguin motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/09/2019. [11298636][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 05/16/2019 by BY] (JBS) [Entered: 05/15/2019 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? YES. Certified Administrative Record due 06/19/2019. Response to motion for stay due 07/10/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 08/19/2019 for Alfredo Magana Arreguin. Respondent brief due 10/17/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. (Motion for IFP & Appointment of Counsel within petition) [11298628][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 05/16/2019 by BY] (JBS) [Entered: 05/15/2019 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Alfredo Magana Arreguin v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ALFREDO MAGANA ARREGUIN | |
| Represented By: | Alfredo Magana Arreguin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Karen L. Melnik |
| Represented By: | Chief Counsel ICE |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
