Top Lighting Corporation v. USDC-CARIV
| TOP LIGHTING CORPORATION, a California Corporation |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE |
| In re: TOP LIGHTING CORPORATION |
| LINCO, INC., a California Corporation |
| 19-71235 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied (Docket Entry No. [ # 1 ]). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11303762] (WL) [Entered: 05/21/2019 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioner Top Lighting Corporation Corporate Disclosure Statement. Served on 05/20/2019. [11303132] (HC) [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Top Lighting Corporation EMERGENCY motion to stay lower court action. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/20/2019. [11303124] (HC) [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11303101] (HC) [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
