Elrader Browning, Jr. v. USDC-CALA
| ELRADER BROWNING, Jr. |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| In re: ELRADER BROWNING, Jr. |
| 19-71254 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, N. RANDY SMITH and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. All pending requests are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [11348161] (OC) [Entered: 06/28/2019 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PETITIONER. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11304479][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 05/22/2019 by BY] (JBS) [Entered: 05/21/2019 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
