Benny Cheung, et al v. William Barr
Petitioner: BENNY WAI LUNG CHEUNG and MIN ZHAO, Beneficiary of a visa petition
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Case Number: 19-71842
Filed: July 23, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Anthony Cardozo Payne, Colette Jabes Winston for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 19-71842. [11375107] (JFF) [Entered: 07/24/2019 11:44 AM]
July 24, 2019 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Anthony, C., Payne (U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 878 Ben Franklin Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 07/24/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11375071] [19-71842] (Payne, Anthony) [Entered: 07/24/2019 11:27 AM]
July 24, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Colette, Winston (U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 878 Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 07/24/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11374725] [19-71842] (OIL, ) [Entered: 07/24/2019 09:42 AM]
July 23, 2019 Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11374375][19-71842] (CD) [Entered: 07/23/2019 05:40 PM]
July 23, 2019 Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 08/27/2019. Response to motion for stay due 09/17/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 10/28/2019 for Benny Wai Lung Cheung and Min Zhao. Respondent brief due 12/26/2019 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11373651] (JMR) [Entered: 07/23/2019 01:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Benny Cheung, et al v. William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BENNY WAI LUNG CHEUNG
Represented By: Douglas Grant Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MIN ZHAO, Beneficiary of a visa petition
Represented By: Douglas Grant Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Anthony Cardozo Payne
Represented By: Colette Jabes Winston Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?