Andrew Kowalczyk v. USDC-ORP
| ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| In re: ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK |
| 19-72267 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition (Docket Entry No. [ # 1 ]) is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [11421855] (JBS) [Entered: 09/05/2019 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PROSE EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11419780][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 09/04/2019 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 09/04/2019 07:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
