Denard Neal v. USA
| DENARD DARNELL NEAL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-72602 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Denard Darnell Neal motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/02/2019. [11464481][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 10/16/2019 by BY] (HC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRO SE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION. This application is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 12-80016. [11464471][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 10/16/2019 by BY] (HC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Denard Neal v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DENARD DARNELL NEAL | |
| Represented By: | Denard Darnell Neal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
