NLRB v. Santos Cruz, LLC
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| SANTOS CRUZ, LLC, DBA Filiberto's |
| 19-73167 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 RECEIVED PROPOSED JUDGMENT. [11530069] (HC) [Entered: 12/12/2019 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED NLRB'S APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY ENTRY OF A JUDGMENT ENFORCING AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: No. [11530037] (HC) [Entered: 12/12/2019 11:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: NLRB v. Santos Cruz, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | David Habenstreit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: SANTOS CRUZ, LLC, DBA Filiberto's | |
| Represented By: | Antonio Padilla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
