Chi-Fu Hsueh, et al v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co., et al
| JOE PROSPICHAL and SHERRY GOLDSMITH |
| DOES, 1 through 20 inclusive |
| BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, CHI-FU HSUEH, an individual and MARAYAM HABASHI, an individual |
| 19-80158 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Respondent Chi-Fu Hsueh answer to 1453c petition. Date of service: 12/05/2019. [11523036] [19-80158] (Renneisen, Gordon) [Entered: 12/05/2019 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioners Bankers Life and Casualty Company and Marayam Habashi Corporate Disclosure Statement. Served on 11/25/2019. [11521037] (HC) [Entered: 12/04/2019 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 FILED ON 12/04/2019 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 1453(c). SERVED ON 11/25/2019. [11521017] (HC) [Entered: 12/04/2019 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 Filed clerk order from case 19-56355: (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record reflects that appellants filed a notice of appeal from the district courts November 13, 2019 order remanding the action. Appellants then filed, at Docket Entry No. 2, a petition under 28 U.S.C. 1453(c) for permission to appeal the district courts remand order. The Clerk shall open the petition filed at Docket Entry No. 2 as a separate action. See Fed. R. App. P. 5. Any answer in opposition to the petition should be filed in the new action in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d), 1453(c)(1). If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11521007] (HC) [Entered: 12/04/2019 01:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
