Carl Anderson, Esq.,In re: Carl Anderson, Esq.,

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Carl Anderson, Esq.,In re: Carl Anderson, Esq.,

Carl Anderson, Esq.,In re: Carl Anderson, Esq.,

Respondent:	In re: CARL ROBERT ANDERSON, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: March 24, 2011
Case Number:	19-80174
Filed:	December 16, 2019
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
December 18, 2019	Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DJV): The court is informed that respondent Carl Robert Anderson, Esq., has been suspended from the practice of law in Arizona. Within 28 days after the date of this order, respondent shall resign from the bar of this court or agree to a concurrent reciprocal suspension from the bar of this court, or shall show cause, in writing, why respondent should not be ineligible to practice law in this court. See In re Rosenthal, 854 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon consideration of the response to this order and after a hearing, if requested, the court will determine whether to order respondent ineligible to practice law in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(c); 9th Cir. R. 46-2(c). Failure to respond to this order in a timely fashion will result in the removal of respondent from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court without further notice. This order shall be provided to respondent by mail at 5627 West Cavedale Drive, Phoenix, Arizona 85083. [11536469] (DJV) [Entered: 12/18/2019 08:20 AM]
December 16, 2019	Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. Respondent has been suspended from the practice of law in Arizona [11533253] (DJV) [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:07 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

December 18, 2019

Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DJV): The court is informed that respondent Carl Robert Anderson, Esq., has been suspended from the practice of law in Arizona. Within 28 days after the date of this order, respondent shall resign from the bar of this court or agree to a concurrent reciprocal suspension from the bar of this court, or shall show cause, in writing, why respondent should not be ineligible to practice law in this court. See In re Rosenthal, 854 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon consideration of the response to this order and after a hearing, if requested, the court will determine whether to order respondent ineligible to practice law in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(c); 9th Cir. R. 46-2(c). Failure to respond to this order in a timely fashion will result in the removal of respondent from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court without further notice. This order shall be provided to respondent by mail at 5627 West Cavedale Drive, Phoenix, Arizona 85083. [11536469] (DJV) [Entered: 12/18/2019 08:20 AM]

December 16, 2019

Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. Respondent has been suspended from the practice of law in Arizona [11533253] (DJV) [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Carl Anderson, Esq.,In re: Carl Anderson, Esq.,
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: In re: CARL ROBERT ANDERSON, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: March 24, 2011
Represented By:	Carl Robert Anderson Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?