Jesus Garcia Muniz v. UtiliQuest, LLC, et al
| DOES, 1-100, inclusive |
| UTILIQUEST, LLC |
| JESUS GARCIA MUNIZ, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated and aggrieved employees |
| 19-80179 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY and RONALD M. GOULD) Petitioners motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition for permission to appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is granted. The reply has been filed. The petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1453(c) is denied. See Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 627 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 2010). [11610336] (JMR) [Entered: 02/26/2020 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Petitioner UtiliQuest, LLC Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Petition for Permission to Appeal]. Date of service: 01/07/2020. [11554143] [19-80179] (Kemple, Mark) [Entered: 01/07/2020 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Respondent Jesus Garcia Muniz answer to 1453c petition. Date of service: 12/30/2019. [11547270] [19-80179] (Vigil-Gallenberg, Rosa) [Entered: 12/30/2019 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner UtiliQuest, LLC Corporate Disclosure Statement. Served on 12/20/2019. [11542089] (HC) [Entered: 12/23/2019 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED ON 12/20/2019 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f) + 1 VOLUME OF EXHIBITS. SERVED ON 12/20/2019. [11542082] (HC) [Entered: 12/23/2019 12:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
