Leroy McGill v. Charles Ryan
RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona Department of Corrections - Eyman Complex and CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections |
LEROY MCGILL |
19-99002 |
February 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): Appellants unopposed motion to extend time in which to file the opening brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is granted. The opening brief and excerpts of record are now due August 5, 2019; the answering brief is due October 4, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11214194] (AF) [Entered: 03/04/2019 09:06 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Leroy McGill Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 08/05/2019. Date of service: 02/28/2019. [11210880] [19-99002] (Garcia, Jennifer) [Entered: 02/28/2019 09:04 AM] |
Filing 3 Added attorney Sara Chimene-Weiss for Leroy McGill, in case 19-99002. [11181975] (CW) [Entered: 02/07/2019 06:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sara Chimene-Weiss for Appellant Leroy McGill. Date of service: 02/06/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11181649] [19-99002] (Chimene-Weiss, Sara) [Entered: 02/06/2019 03:40 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Leroy McGill opening brief due 04/08/2019. Appellees Ron Credio and Charles L. Ryan, Warden answering brief due 06/07/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11179584] (HH) [Entered: 02/05/2019 11:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.