USA v. Rufino Valdez-Lopez
RUFINO VALDEZ-LOPEZ |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-10004 |
January 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 300 Months with credit for time served. Transcript ordered by 01/29/2020. Transcript due 02/28/2020. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 04/08/2020 for Rufino Valdez-Lopez. Appellee brief due 05/08/2020 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11556268] (JPD) [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Rufino Valdez-Lopez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: RUFINO VALDEZ-LOPEZ | |
Represented By: | Mark A. Heath Esquire II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Raymond K. Woo Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.