Jordan Venable v. Don Calender, et al
| CHRISTABEL WARZEL, MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURTS, DON CALENDER and UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as David B |
| JORDAN DUKE VENABLE |
| 20-15030 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, MDS and NRS) [11598119] (RR) [Entered: 02/14/2020 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and N. RANDY SMITH) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11572300] (JBS) [Entered: 01/23/2020 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Jordan Duke Venable opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 01/14/2020. Major deficiencies: IFP motion pending. [11572246] (KT) [Entered: 01/23/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jordan Duke Venable motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11569759] (NAC) [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jordan Duke Venable opening brief due 03/02/2020. (No appearance for Appellees, no answering brief deadlines set) [11555007] (HC) [Entered: 01/08/2020 11:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
