Tony Nunez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY NUNEZ, by and through personal representative Sandy Sanchez and TONY NUNEZ, individually and as a successor-in-interest to Decedent Anthony Nunez
Defendant / Appellant: ANTHONY VIZZUSI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department and MICHAEL SANTOS, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department
Case Number: 20-15057
Filed: January 14, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2020 Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: JW) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [11612709] (EU) [Entered: 02/28/2020 11:59 AM]
February 25, 2020 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 02/25/2020. [11608163] [20-15057] (Chow, Yue-Han) [Entered: 02/25/2020 11:55 AM]
February 10, 2020 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The dial-in assessment conference scheduled for February 12, 2020, is canceled. By 04/10/2020, Appellants to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. See order for details. [11592252] (BLS) [Entered: 02/10/2020 04:51 PM]
February 3, 2020 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/12/2020, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11582371] (BLS) [Entered: 02/03/2020 10:50 AM]
January 21, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11569257]. [20-15057] (AD) [Entered: 01/21/2020 06:44 PM]
January 21, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/21/2020. [11569028] [20-15057] (Chow, Yue-Han) [Entered: 01/21/2020 04:12 PM]
January 14, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/21/2020. Transcript ordered by 02/12/2020. Transcript due 03/13/2020. Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi opening brief due 04/22/2020. Appellees Tony Nunez and The Estate of Anthony Nunez answering brief due 05/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11561569] (JBS) [Entered: 01/14/2020 11:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tony Nunez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY NUNEZ, by and through personal representative Sandy Sanchez
Represented By: Patrick M. Buelna
Represented By: Lateef Hasani Gray
Represented By: John L. Burris Esquire
Represented By: Adante D. Pointer Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: TONY NUNEZ, individually and as a successor-in-interest to Decedent Anthony Nunez
Represented By: Patrick M. Buelna
Represented By: Lateef Hasani Gray
Represented By: John L. Burris Esquire
Represented By: Adante D. Pointer Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ANTHONY VIZZUSI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department
Represented By: Yue-Han Chow
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Ardell Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: MICHAEL SANTOS, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department
Represented By: Yue-Han Chow
Represented By: Nora Valerie Frimann
Represented By: Ardell Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?