Tony Nunez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
CITY OF SAN JOSE |
THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY NUNEZ, by and through personal representative Sandy Sanchez and TONY NUNEZ, individually and as a successor-in-interest to Decedent Anthony Nunez |
ANTHONY VIZZUSI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department and MICHAEL SANTOS, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department |
20-15057 |
January 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: JW) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [11612709] (EU) [Entered: 02/28/2020 11:59 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 02/25/2020. [11608163] [20-15057] (Chow, Yue-Han) [Entered: 02/25/2020 11:55 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The dial-in assessment conference scheduled for February 12, 2020, is canceled. By 04/10/2020, Appellants to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. See order for details. [11592252] (BLS) [Entered: 02/10/2020 04:51 PM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/12/2020, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11582371] (BLS) [Entered: 02/03/2020 10:50 AM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11569257]. [20-15057] (AD) [Entered: 01/21/2020 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/21/2020. [11569028] [20-15057] (Chow, Yue-Han) [Entered: 01/21/2020 04:12 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/21/2020. Transcript ordered by 02/12/2020. Transcript due 03/13/2020. Appellants Michael Santos and Anthony Vizzusi opening brief due 04/22/2020. Appellees Tony Nunez and The Estate of Anthony Nunez answering brief due 05/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11561569] (JBS) [Entered: 01/14/2020 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Tony Nunez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY NUNEZ, by and through personal representative Sandy Sanchez | |
Represented By: | Patrick M. Buelna |
Represented By: | Lateef Hasani Gray |
Represented By: | John L. Burris Esquire |
Represented By: | Adante D. Pointer Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: TONY NUNEZ, individually and as a successor-in-interest to Decedent Anthony Nunez | |
Represented By: | Patrick M. Buelna |
Represented By: | Lateef Hasani Gray |
Represented By: | John L. Burris Esquire |
Represented By: | Adante D. Pointer Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: ANTHONY VIZZUSI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department | |
Represented By: | Yue-Han Chow |
Represented By: | Nora Valerie Frimann |
Represented By: | Ardell Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: MICHAEL SANTOS, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the San Jose Police Department | |
Represented By: | Yue-Han Chow |
Represented By: | Nora Valerie Frimann |
Represented By: | Ardell Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.