Pietro Sgromo v. Leonard Scott, et al
| EUREKA INVENTIONS LLC and LEONARD GREGORY SCOTT |
| PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONI SGROMO, AKA Peter Anthony Sgromo |
| 20-15106 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, RMG and PJW) [11638460] (RR) [Entered: 03/23/2020 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, RONALD M. GOULD and PAUL J. WATFORD): Appellees motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]). See 28 U.S.C. 1291. DISMISSED. [11613602] (AF) [Entered: 02/28/2020 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Pietro Pasquale-Antoni Sgromo response opposing motion ([ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 02/05/2020. [11586614] [20-15106] (Sgromo, Pietro) [Entered: 02/05/2020 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka Inventions LLC Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 02/04/2020. [11585389] [20-15106] (Moore, Thomas) [Entered: 02/04/2020 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Pietro Pasquale-Antoni Sgromo opening brief due 03/23/2020. Appellees Eureka Inventions LLC and Leonard Gregory Scott answering brief due 04/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11573048] (JBS) [Entered: 01/24/2020 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
